IGTO launches review into ATO’s communication of taxpayer rights

The IGTO has announced a review into the effectiveness of ATO communication of taxpayers’ rights to complain, review and appeal.

by | Jun 30, 2020

ASIC accuses banks of dragging feet on fees-for-no-service response

The Inspector-General of Taxation and Taxation Ombudsman (IGTO), Karen Payne, has announced the launch of a new investigation into effective communication of taxpayer rights to review, complain and appeal decisions made and actions taken by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). 

The IGTO’s investigation aims to understand and confirm how effectively the ATO communicates appropriate information to taxpayers and their representatives on these taxpayer rights.

The review will involve an investigation of a selection of written communications of ATO decisions made – for clear communication of the taxpayers’ rights to review, complain and appeal these decisions.  

While the Taxpayers’ Charter notes that taxpayers have the right to be informed of their rights or obligations when the ATO makes decisions about them and their right to question, the IGTO has found that the ATO-issued correspondence differs. 

“The Taxpayers’ Charter states that the ATO will ‘outline [the taxpayer’s] options if [they] want a decision or action reviewed, including legal review rights and the formal complaint process’,” said Ms Payne.   

“The IGTO has observed through the taxation complaints service that information on rights of appeal and opportunities to raise complaints varies across different types of ATO-issued correspondence.”

The IGTO noted it will undertake this investigation in stages, focusing initially on ATO communications that concern debt decisions; individuals and small business taxpayers – which likely do not have significant financial resources to appeal taxation decisions in the courts.

The review will also confirm ATO communications around access to the AAT Small Business Taxation Division (SBT Division).

All taxpayers, advisers (tax practitioners, solicitors or barristers) and professional bodies are being invited to provide observations, comments and suggestions to this review. 

Share This